Jump to content


SpywareBlaster


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
3 replies to this topic

#1 PeggyB

    Administrator

  • 17,492 posts
  • Joined: October 04, 2004
  • 689 topics
  • Age: 64
  • Skin: Smartest
  • Local time: 11:55 PM
  • Zodiac:Scorpio
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Pensacola, FL
  • OS:Windows XP
  • Country:
Offline
  • Time Online: 8d 4h 43m 14s

Posted 19 April 2008 - 10:48 PM

Vista was compatable until an update today. It will not protect Seamonkey. Is there something I can do? This is what I get...........

Access violation at 0x76EC77F8 (tried to read from 0x00096FFC) program terminated.


#2 dobhar Re: SpywareBlaster

    Member

  • 6,611 posts
  • Joined: October 07, 2004
  • 180 topics
  • Skin: IP.Board
  • Local time: 11:55 PM
  • Zodiac:Aquarius
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • OS:other
  • Country:
Offline
  • :

Posted 20 April 2008 - 03:46 PM

Hi Peggy...

Google came up blank on the error. Have you tired uninstalling SB, rebooting PC, then reinstalling?

#3 PeggyB Re: SpywareBlaster

    Administrator

  • 17,492 posts
  • Joined: October 04, 2004
  • 689 topics
  • Age: 64
  • Skin: Smartest
  • Local time: 11:55 PM
  • Zodiac:Scorpio
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Pensacola, FL
  • OS:Windows XP
  • Country:
Offline
  • Time Online: 8d 4h 43m 14s

Posted 20 April 2008 - 04:50 PM

Yes, did that..... :head_wall:

#4 Larry(ne) Re: SpywareBlaster

    Moderator..DUH..DUH!

  • 3,240 posts
  • Joined: October 07, 2004
  • 99 topics
  • Age: 75
  • Skin: Paradox
  • Local time: 11:55 PM
  • Zodiac:Scorpio
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairbury Ne.
  • OS:Windows 7
  • Country:
Offline
  • Time Online: 15d 23h 2m 7s

Posted 20 April 2008 - 05:17 PM

You might check this forum out HERE

there is a update in spybot which fixes that problem that was released today
That's for Firefox ,But give a try
Lots of people having problems with that up date
Thanks JRAM for the new Computer.
Posted Image





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic has been visited by 0 user(s)